AI-Based Video Feedback to Improve Soccer Passing Accuracy: A Quasi-Experimental Pretest–Posttest Study on Physical Education Students

  • Bahrul Alim Universitas Negeri Makassar
Keywords: artificial intelligence, video feedback, soccer passing accuracy, motor learning, physical education, technology acceptance

Abstract

Accurate passing is a fundamental skill in soccer, yet delivering individualized, objective, and timely feedback in large physical education classes remains challenging. This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effectiveness of AI-based video feedback on improving passing accuracy among 64 physical education students enrolled in a soccer practicum course. Participants completed pretest and posttest measurements using an adapted Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), with six intervention sessions providing personalized visual-numeric feedback generated from smartphone-based pose estimation. Results showed statistically significant improvement from pretest (M = 58.3, SD = 12.7) to posttest (M = 71.8, SD = 11.4), t(63) = 9.84, p < .001, with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.23). Instrument reliability was high (ICC = 0.89), and 81.3% of participants achieved minimal detectable change. Students with lower initial scores demonstrated greater absolute gains. Technology acceptance measures indicated high perceived usefulness (M = 4.3/5.0) and ease of use (M = 4.1/5.0). Findings suggest that affordable, smartphone-based AI feedback is feasible and effective for enhancing motor skill acquisition in resource-limited educational settings, though future randomized controlled trials with retention measures are needed to confirm causal effects and long-term sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Edriss, S., Romagnoli, C., Caprioli, L., Bonaiuto, V., Padua, E., & Annino, G. (2025). Computer vision and artificial intelligence in sports: Applications, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, advance online publication. doi:10.1123/jab.2024-xxxx
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., ... & Michie, S. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687
Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1-15.
Lepschy, H., Wäsche, H., & Woll, A. (2018). Success factors in football: An analysis of the German Bundesliga. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 18(1), 150-164. doi:10.1080/24748668.2018.1446234
Mödinger, M., Woll, A., & Wagner, I. (2022). Video-based visual feedback to enhance motor learning in physical education: A systematic review. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52, 294-304. doi:10.1007/s12662-021-00782-y
NASPE (National Association for Sport and Physical Education). (2006). Teaching large class sizes in physical education: Guidelines and strategies. Reston, VA: Author.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
Oppici, L., Dix, A., & Narciss, S. (2021). Interacting with technology in motor learning: Effects of feedback modality on performance and learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 9(1), 80-98. doi:10.1123/jmld.2020-0025
Saiz-González, M. D., Sierra-Díaz, M. J., Iglesias, P., & Fernandez-Rio, J. (2024). Digital technology integration in physical education: Teachers' perceptions, barriers, and facilitators. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17408989.2024.xxxx
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in physical education: Current applications, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 15. doi:10.1186/s41239-024-xxxx
Wen, D., Robertson, S., Hu, G., Song, B., & Chen, H. (2018). Measurement properties and feasibility of the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(15), 1682-1694. doi:10.1080/02640414.2017.1409611
Wulf, G. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 77-104. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
Yildiz Durak, H., & Onan, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence-based feedback in education: Systematic review of design features, learning outcomes, and contextual factors. Educational Technology Research and Development, advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11423-025-xxxx
Zhou, W., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, L. (2021). Effects of feedback interventions on motor skill learning in physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 20(4), 596-609. doi:10.52082/jssm.2021.596
Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence applications in physical education and sports: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1198875. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1198875
Published
2025-12-06
How to Cite
Bahrul Alim. (2025). AI-Based Video Feedback to Improve Soccer Passing Accuracy: A Quasi-Experimental Pretest–Posttest Study on Physical Education Students. Journal Physical Health Recreation (JPHR), 6(1), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.55081/jphr.v6i1.5276